OKI Microline 3320 vs Epson FX-890II

Detailed Technical Comparison & Buying Guide

OKI Microline 3320 OKI Microline 3320
VS
Epson FX-890II Epson FX-890II

OKI Microline 3320

✅ High-speed and built like a tank for industrial use.
❌ Outdated interface requiring adapters for modern PCs.

Epson FX-890II

✅ Excellent build quality.
❌ Slightly higher running costs.
Feature OKI Microline 3320 Epson FX-890II
Number of Pins 9 Pins 9 Pins
Printing Columns 80 Columns 80 Columns
High Speed Draft 435 cps 612 cps
Draft Speed 387 cps N/A
Letter Quality Speed N/A N/A
Copy Capability 1 original + 4 copies 1 original + 6 copies
Mean Time Between Failure 10,000 Hours 25,000 Hours
Ribbon Life 3 Million Characters 7.5 Million Characters
Print Head Life 200 Million Characters N/A
Paper Feed Path Top, Bottom, Rear N/A
Control Emulations Epson FX, IBM ProPrinter, OKI Microline N/A
Noise Level 57 dB(A) N/A
Interfaces USB, Parallel N/A

⚖️ Expert Verdict

The OKI ML3320 is a cult classic in UK garages and warehouses—it simply refuses to die. However, the Epson FX-890II is the modern update your business actually needs. It’s significantly faster and much easier to manage over a network. While the OKI is a nostalgic bit of kit that's proper tough, the Epson FX-890II wins for its superior speed and much lower power consumption. For a business that values efficiency as much as durability, the Epson is the winner for moving your impact printing into the modern era.

What Owners Are Saying?

OKI Microline 3320

OldSchool_Len
"Absolute unit of a warehouse printer. We've had one running for a decade and it’s still going. A bit of a faff to set up on a modern PC, but for continuous forms, it’s a legend."

Epson FX-890II

Warehouse_Wiz
"Absolute unit of an impact printer. We use it in our distribution center for multi-part shipping manifests and it handles the dust and the volume without throwing a single wobbly. It’s loud as a tractor, but the speed for 9-pin printing is proper impressive. Strategic win for any logistics biz."

More Comparisons